QUESTION(S) PRESENTED
Well the U.S. Supreme Court allow the lower U.S. Court of Appeals to “MANDATE” a U. S. District court to stop a lawsuit in which documented and supporting evidence is accusing that U.S. Appeals Court of a cover-up in which they have change the caption of a case from their title and others off a lawsuit and substituted it to read “U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION”?
Well the U.S. Supreme Court realize the dangers that await when people find out that judges who have used their authority to cover-up such crimes as fixing transcripts in a divorce cases or use state laws to steal money out of a banks in other states, even when there is a police officer who will also testify to the fixing of transcripts?
Well the U.S. Supreme Court allow federal judges to use their blind eye to the law that requires a party to be able to amend any complaint if there is/ are discrepancies in a lawsuit… like “to state a claim upon relief can be granted” in which they find a reason why not to hear the case to dismiss it?
Does the U.S. Supreme Court believe it is just and right to grant or hear only 1% of all the filed cases seeking justice or relief in which this so-call “legal system” and highest Court in the land, in which any person (or a person filing on behalf of a thing/ group…etc) who may file in a state or federal justice system and then to an appeals court…seeking justice or relief… in which to the 99% who like me want to see justice work right, knowing that the odds are against us when it comes to getting justice at this level, will be deny a comment or give an explanation to their case not being heard?
At what point will the U.S Supreme Court believe that it might be possible that there are bad federal and state judges who use their so-call “authority” to cover-up crimes for others or themselves by dismissing cases, or changed them… like in this case “fixing transcripts or court documents and dismissing case in a criminal like conspiracy”…as to warrant such “authority” to be look into… which shows a system of “hypocrites”… and thereby be subject to judgment… the question is at what point will you ACT on such charges?
LIST OF PARTIES
Do to the nature of this case I have not listed individual names or titles… Given the fact that this suit is a group of people who claim to have legal authority over other people and they are cheating and covering up crimes for themselves and their co-workers. Though some names will pop out easily, I feel if I list such name in this section, they would not get a fair trial where they should be considered innocent until proven guilty. As I believe I was considered insane going into my divorce and am trying to prove myself sane to the U.S. Supreme Court to get a kind of justice that the people will see.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………. 1
JURISDICTION………………………………………………………………….. 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED……… 1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE…………………………………………………… 2
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT……………………………………… 4
CONCLUSTION…………………………………………………………………… 4
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A MANDATE OF U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 9TH CIRCUIT
APPENDIX B ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
APPENDIX C EVIDENCE that the 9th Circuti change a lawsuit title taking their title off Replacing it under “US PAROLE COMMISSION”
APPENDIX D US DISTRICT COURT ORDER Denying to proceed in forma pauperis
APPENDIX E US DISTRICT COURT ORCER Denying the Appeal to proceed in forma, pauperis to the 9th Circuit
APPENDIX F MEMORANDUM U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 9TH CIRCUIT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Opinions below
This is for cases from federal courts:
The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix A to the petition. This Mandate, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed June 5, 2009, and the Order on Mandate by US District Court (Reno) filed on June 8,2009 is not attached.
In Appendix B that is being contested is the Order on 05/28/09 denying a rehearing en banc by the same panel in which a timely petition for was submitted.
In Appendix C shows how the caption being changed from what was filed in the District Court to changing it to Armstrong… US Parole Commission.
In Appendix D shows the US District Court order filed on Oct. 6, 2008 denying Motion / Application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se Complaint.
In Appendix E shows the US District Court Denying my Application to appeal to the US court of appeals in forma pauperis filed Dec.4,2008.
In Appendix F shows the Memorandum from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed March 9,2009, granting the motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter which the lower court denied twice.
JURISDICTION
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1)
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
THE RIGHT TO TRIAL… PARENTAL RIGHTS… JUSTICE … like 1443
STATEMENT OF CASE
Plaintiff had a vision of 911…discovered his wife had an affair… went to marriage counseling… priest/ doctor… which then lead to him becoming a defendant in a divorce case filed in Sept of 1997.
Plaintiff argued with the judge in court and in responding papers over issue of child custody/ visitation and support, when he was forced of the 6,500 family home that plaintiff was finishing up building, as he was a general contractor, he was forced out with no money, no car and no history of violence… and before plaintiff filed 4 motions, in which one of those was to disqualify the judge under law 170.6 for bias. The Judge refused to disqualify himself from bias, even when it was pointed out that people had been picketing outside his courthouse for years for bias prior to this case.
This divorce judge declared plaintiff a vexatious litigant right after plaintiff disqualified him and placed plaintiff on a state wide list while he refused to give plaintiff any money to live on and then had a fake trial were his buddy attorney friend had slip a 85 page document into plaintiffs cardboard box of papers claiming 96.8% of a former house I had total remolded and added on too. Plaintiff also help pay back the $90,000 loan the couple had borrowed to buy that house.
Plaintiff also had borrowed and had paid back (most of his share) a running loan to his ex-father-in law ($50,000) that was not reported by his ex-wife or her father in her divorce papers and was charged 8% interest on this loan along with an 8% interest that his 5 year old son was charging via (his mother) divorce documents in which she was the accountant (CPA) and handled all money matters for the family. Plaintiff contested the loans were interest free and only was charge interest because of the divorce. Plaintiff had also stated that there attorney had already did this once before with a my former sister-in law and had call her crazy.
Plaintiff had filed a class action lawsuit against this divorce judge (and all California judges) in federal court for placing him on a list of vexatious litigants and served him prior to the child support issue. In response the divorce judge awarded $666 a month to this lawsuit. He also refuse to let me have any of the community assets (stocks and 401K worth about $200,000 at the time of the start of the divorce) to live on or to use to bail myself out of jail in which my ex-father-in law had me arrested claiming I drove by the house… I did not and had to spend 16 days in jail… represented myself before a jury and showed a note written by my ex-father in law at the time stating that he was not sure it was me…
Plaintiff had sought justice in the federal courts and trying to remove this case under rule 1443, after the county counsel had submitted half transcripts to mislead the federal judge in the vexatious litigant trial claiming under penalty of perjury that they were full transcripts. But another local federal judge dismissed that lawsuit to start the cover-ups as they refused to transfer the case back to the first federal judge who was assigned the case.
The following State judges who were assigned this case would refuse to hear this case and use CCP 391.7 to deny my right to file papers in the state court (see filed feb.6, 2001 and March 6.2001 in federal and state records as I would submit these as evidence in documents). As they used this law to strip the right to due process of law.
Plaintiff had moved out of California and continued to seek justice through the federal court system, but even then the federal court refuse to hear the case. Plaintiff did appear several times in state court but they would limit my filing of responding papers to 10 and a cop even wrote a note in which the transcripts say more as I accused the judge of fixing the transcripts as I argued against such judges who help with try to cover-up such crimes as plaintiff claimed several judges had fixed the transcripts.
The Local Federal courts had placed petitioners vexatious litigant case with two other cases that were questioning the constitutional grounds on such a list. The Federal and California judges would not hear the vexatious litigant case or argument and had place it before judge Armstrong who turned out to have declared one of the other plaintiffs vexatious, in federal court.
When that came to light, she refused to disqualify herself and she dismissed all three cases where the court of appeals had help cover-up her crime. When I sued the ninth circuit they changed the titled of the lawsuit.
Plaintiff was served documents in Nevada by a California Judge to come to court and pay the federal court attorney fees cost in the divorce hearing and when plaintiff did not show up to court the judge placed a $130,000 arrest warrant out on plaintiff. As plaintiff filed documents after documents in both federal and state court who refused to give plaintiff his right to due process or any other rights what so ever.
Plaintiff discovered that his Nevada bank account was robbed by the California system and laws and had sued in federal court again. The same federal judges still would not raise one finger to stop such abuse of law and authority as they themselves became a part of the conspiracy by allowing such crimes to continue to this level where one has to seek the supreme court to act on such a complaint were the same people who plaintiff is suing are dismissing these cases or their friends are.
Plaintiff was arrested in 2008 in California and was not allowed to defend himself in a court. He was order to see a doctor, but has been denied the report and claims that the local assigned attorney who was appointed counsel for plaintiff is part of the conspiracy and refused to seek any kind of justice for plaintiff. Plaintiff was told he well not get a jury in this court by this attorney and the doctor and the court refuse to release the report to plaintiff. (email records)
Plaintiff failed to return to court to make a plea. The court refuses to except documents from plaintiff and have placed $150,000 arrest warrant out on plaintiff. Plaintiff continues to send out letters and complaints and has sent out letters to every state senator, every U.S district court in the nation and personally to every Court of Appeals judge in the nation… etc. Petitioner is pretty sure he notified everyone of this action. That is anyone or group that claims to have some authority to stop such abuse from happening… This is the third attempt this year to file this case in the Supreme Court this year.
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT AND CONCLUSTION
The number one reason why the Supreme Court should grant this writ is to show that there is justice and that the Supreme court will not let those lower courts get away with robbing people like the plaintiff, and using their authority to cover-up or dismiss cases, without consequences of a higher court stepping in.
If the Supreme Court refuses to do something, does it not give the plaintiff or others the power to act as described in the declaration of independence… you know the clause that say… it is the right… it is the duty… to overthrow that government… (You guys really don’t want to see that… do you?)
The integrity of the justice system rest upon the choices of it judges. Therefore those judges should know the consequences in which there actions or inactions affect people and the value they place on people and things. To take away my rights as a parent… well… As everyone has certain rights… and when governments abuse these rights… well… people will fight back… you should grant this writ to show that the “first” (Amendment) way to fight this is with words… (with or without “money”) and that is the right way…
BECAUSE the “second” way to argue against wrongs…well… do you want to see and at what cost will it take…
I pushed this case in forma pauperis to show the value of money to the judges who fought against me. I do not and will not work for them. I WORK AGAINST THEM. I work for those who support me and the truth and not cover up crimes by their co-workers or for themselves.
SUBMITTED
DATE: Aug.11, 2009 __________________________________
Tevis R. Ignacio
